Back
to Unedited Philosophy Quotes and Ramblings about Intequinism.
Title: The Penguin Dictionary of PHILOSOPHY
Author: Thomas Mautner
Year: 2005
Edition: 2nd edition
Place: London
Publisher: Penguin
Reader: Mr. M.D. Pienaar
22 September 2012
Page 48
'Arminianism a theological
outlook, named after the Reformed Dutch theologian Jacob
Arminius (1560-1609). It was semi-Pelagian, and rejected the
doctrines of pre-destination. At the important synod of Dort
(Dordrecht) 1618-19, the Arminian remonstrances were condemned
in favour of a more rigorous Calvinism; a prominent member of
the defeated party was GROTIUS. In effect, though not in name,
it has prevailed in Methodist, Baptist, and many established
Protestant churches. '
Page 457
' Pelagianism n. the
doctrine that man's will is free too choose between
good and evil, and that there is a natural human capacity for
good. This implies a denial of the dogma of original sin, and
reduces or eliminates the need for incarnation. It was
proposed by the British monk Pelagius (c. 354-c. 418),
in opposition to the theology of St Paul with its emphasis on
justification through divine grace, which in the opinion of
Pelagius discouraged believers from making a moral effort and
resulted in moral slackness. Augustine, a contemporary of
Pelagius, vehemently opposed Pelagianism, and in the early
fifth century it was condemned by the Church and has been
rejected in mainstream theology since then, although it has
attracted many Christian thinkers. '
26 September 2012
' Bergson /bεʀɡsↄ [ↄ should have a tilde] (Fr.)/,Henri
(1859-1941) professor at Collège de
France . . . In Les Deux sources de
la morale et de la religion 1932 (Two sources of
Morality and Religion 1935), history is presented as a
struggle between two types of society: the open society is
free, expansive, creative – it has a place for reformers and
innovators; the closed society is hidebound, dominated by
established customs, conservative and unfree. Bergson's
thought, with its emphasis on intuition and human freedom,
exercised a major influence in France, but also
internationally, which only began to wane to-wards the
mid-century. '
27 September 2012
' Berlin /bᴈ׃'lɪn/, Sir Isaiah (1909-97) A
philosophical self-portrait: . . . In
mid-life, influenced especially by the Russian radical
Alexander Herzen, I abandoned philosophy for the history of
ideas: I believe in the dominant influence of ideas, which
seems to me at least as powerful as that of impersonal
forces. . . Yet I have never departed from an
empirical viewpoint, derived mainly from Kant and Hume, nor
sought light in metaphysics.
My published lectures attacking
historical determinism and on the distinction between negative
and positive liberty, the contrast between negative and
positive liberty, the contrast between the empirical and the
'true' or 'real' selves, and their ethical and political
distortions, have led to very widespread comment and
controversy, which still continued. . .
The first thinker, in my view, who
truly distinguishes between values that are equally ultimate,
but incompatible, is Machiavelli, who thought that successful
statesmanship conflicted with Christian values. '
27 October 2013
In
the
definition of "future contingents" Mautner wrote that
according to Ockham, Aristotle raised a question about truths
of statements about the future. "There will be a sea battle
tomorrow." Is the statement about tomorrow true or false? In
his opinions and solutions to the problem Aristotle accepted
the principle of the excluded middle and rejected the
principle of bivalence. (Mautner. 2005: 237-238)
Aristotle's 'golden
mean'[1]
was the preferred position of Scholastic Christianity.
Tarnas opines that Aristotle was an ancient empiricist[2].
I opine that Aristotle was not objective due to him choosing
the mean[3]
as politically correct communication. The mean does not
exist in words and can therefore not be explained
objectively. Contradictions are a necessity to explain a
mean. Some postmodernists[4]
have the same inclinations with regard to metaphorical
language as during the Middle Ages and Scholastic
Christianity. A good example of this influence is Thomas
Aquinas[5]
via Aristotle. (Copied from:
MDPienaar-23990163-FILM878-Prof.Goudzwaard-3.doc)
Today i think it is not possible to
generalize with regard to bivalence and excluded middles
because the truth value of a sentence depends on the
sentence structure, the timing and the territory (space) for
example, of a specific sentence.
4 November 2013
"Heraclitus ..
Writing in riddling prose epigrams, he announced that he
would expound the nature of things according to the Logos, the
objective principle of order in the world. Although the
Logos is available to all, most mortals ignore it, living
like sleep-walkers, in a dream world of their own. The
philosopher's task, Heraclitus implies, is to express
everyday truths in such a way that their underlying meaning
can leap to one's attention - like the solution of a riddle.
Thus Heraclitus presents paradoxical truths: The way up and
the way down are one and the same. ... This doctrine of flux
is probably not that ultimate reality is change, but that
change is the manner in which ultimate reality, Logos,
manifests itself.
...For Heraclitus, the ultimate reality is not any
substance, for substances are not permanent; but the process
of change, the law of transformation, which is perhaps to be
identified with the Logos itself." (Mautner 2005: 271-272)
"Aquinas ..,
Thomas (c. 1225-74) Aquinas was born into an aristocratic
family at Roccasecca in the south of Italy. As a teenager,
he studied Aristotle at university of Naples and then,
against his family's wishes, he became a Dominican friar.
After studying with Albert the Great at Cologne, Aquinas
went to the university of Paris. The rest of his career was
divided between Paris and Italy."[6]
"Henry
of
Ghent
... His theological orientation was conservative: in
particular, he was opposed to the influence of Aristotle on
the theology of the time, and he was one of the leading
figures behind the condemnation of Aristotelian doctrines
promulgated by the University of Paris in 1277."[7]
7 November 2013
"ideology .. the
term was first used by Destutt de Tracy in Eléments d' idéologie
1796 to designate a projected science of ideas, which he
described as a branch of zoology devoted to empirical
investigation of the origins of ideas and the relations
between them. The practical objective of this science was to
provide a new basis for education, free from any religious
and metaphysical prejudices." The word changed into other
meanings inclusive of negative connotations relating to
indoctrination. In "The
German
Ideology
1845-1846" Marx and
Engels portrayed ideology with negative connotations. Marx
wrote in his foreword to "A
Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy" 'ideology' happens when " 'men
become' " aware
of their competing interests.[8]
I downloaded two eBooks by Destutt de Tracy
from the internet, which was originally published by Thomas
Jefferson.
5
March 2016
"MacPherson,
Crawford Brough (1911-87) ... He attacked the fixation on
the market in current political thought, and the narrow
conception of human nature that goes with it. In The Political Theory of
Possessive Individualism 1962 and in his introduction
to the Penguin edition of Hobbes's Leviathan he argued
that such an outlook is present in the classical political
writings of Hobbes and Locke who, according to MacPherson,
were ideologists of the rising bourgeoisie. That outlook, he
urges, ought now be superseded: instead of private
utility-maximisation the overriding ideal should be one of
full actualization of human potentiality in cooperation with
others." (Mautner 2005:369)
7
March 2016
"Miletus a Greek
city-state on the Ionian west coast of Asia Minor (today's
Turkey), home to the first philosophers, Thales, Anaximander
and Anaximenes, in the sixth century BC." (Mautner 2005:389)
22
March 2016
"Owen Robert
(1771-1858) ... Owen rejected Malthus's theory of
population. He argued that if the population were to
increase as envisaged by Malthus, the increase in total
needs requiring satisfaction would be more than offset by
increased productivity." (Mautner 2005:446) It depends on
how well societies subscribe to the ideas Truth and Love
(social contract theory). If they do subscribe then Owen's
philosophy applies. If they don't Malthus's applies, because
then not enough creativities will exist to balance
procreation and production.
6
March 2016
"social contract theory
... In ancient times Protagoras, Hippias, Lycophron and
other Sophists favoured a theory of this kind. In the modern
ear, it was proposed in various forms by many political
thinkers including Hobbes, Pufendorf, Locke and Rousseau.
Present-day philosophers, among them John Rawls and David
Gauthier, have revived the tradition: a just society is one
that would satisfy the clauses of a contract that rational
human agents under certain specified conditions would be
prepared to agree to." (Mautner 2005:577)
7
March 2016
"Stoicism ... Their
physics is a materialist, though not atomistic or atheistic
system. ... The whole universe is formed and guided by a logos, or reason,
which is itself composed of matter in its finest degree of
tension. This logos can be understood as God, as nature, as
fate and as providence. The individual human mind is a
'seed' of the logos, and the purpose of an individual life
is a progressive grasp of, and adaptation to, the overall
purposes of the universe. The Stoics believed that the
regularity of the natural world provided evidence for these
purposes, and in this way they formulated an argument from
design for the existence of gods, or God. Their way of
arguing is presented in Cicero's De natura deorum
(On the nature of the gods). ... The ideal of conformity
with logos implied an ethical cosmopolitanism: all human
beings are by nature fellow-citizens of one world, divided
only by artificial convention." (Mautner 2005:595)
16
April 2016
"volonté générale;
volenté de tous .. general will; will of all.
Two concepts contrasted in Rousseau's Contrat Social 1762
(Social
contract). The general will, distilled from the particular
wills of the citizens, is always right. The will of all, in
contrast, can be wrong and when it is it ought to be
disregarded. The general will is always directed towards
that which is truly in the citizens' interest. The will of
all, in contrast, is directed towards that which the
citizens may favour even if it is not really in their
interest." (Mautner 2005:648) Rousseau's social contract
theory did not have the ideas Truth and Love above the
general will.
17
April 2016
"Walloston ..
William (1660-1724) ... He gave a special slant to his
ethical rationalism - the view that our reason gives us
direct insight into the rightness or wrongness of kinds of
actions - by assimilating wrongdoing to the telling of a
falsehood. This was criticized by Hutcheson in section 3 of
Illustrations on the
Moral Sense 1728 and by Hume in Treatise of Human
Nature 1740, 3,I,I." (Mautner 2005:659)
"Wyclif .. John (c.
1328-84) ... Wyclif also attracted hostility from the
orthodox establishment because of his implicit rejection of
the doctrine of transubstantiation. He was led to this view
through his philosophical realism, inspired by his reading
of Plato and Augustine: universals exist prior to, and
independently of, particulars. In Bohemia, Johan Hus adopted
many of Wyclif's theological and political ideas." (Mautner
2005:660)
"Xenophanes .. (c.
570-c. 475BC) ... 'But
mortals think the gods are born, ... Africans say the gods
are snub-nosed and black, Thracians say they are blue-eyed
and red-haired. (fr. 16)' But in reality there is one
God, unlike humans in body and mind, who, remaining
motionless, causes change by thought alone. And all of him
sees, thinks and hears." (Mautner 2005:661)
ARISTOTLE. Gamma
7 (In
The metaphysics. Translated by Hugh Lawson-Tancred,
107-108. London, England: Penguin. 2004)
MAUTNER,
T. 2005. The Penguin
dictionary of philosophy.
(London, England: Penguin, 2nd edition)
TARNAS,
R. V:
the modern world view, VI: the transformation of the modern
era. (In The passion of the western mind, 223 –
415. London, England: Pimlico. 1996.)
VENTER,
J.J. Nature
versus culture. (In North-West University.
Geskiedenis van die filosofie: studiegids vir PHIL221 PAC, p.
99 - 138. Potchefstroom, South Africa. 2012a.)
[1]
Venter, J.J. The ide, 156.; Venter, J.J. Nat,
107.
[2]
Tarnas, R. The pas,
291-292.
[3]
Aristotle did not convincingly defend the law of
the excluded middle according to me (Aristotle. Gam,
107). Venter opined that Hume's critique of art was
influenced by Aristotle's 'golden mean' (Venter, J.J.
Nat, 107.)
[4]
Tarnas, R. The pas, 405.
[5]
Tarnas, R. The pas, 252.
[6]
Mautner, T. 2005. The Penguin dictionary of
philosophy, 37.
[7]
Mautner, T. 2005. The Penguin dictionary of
philosophy, 271.
[8]
Mautner, T. 2005. The Penguin dictionary of
philosophy, 294.